Risk Report Template
Metadata
Include the following variables with the information compiled for the respective market in the header of the risk report:
export const pool_Id = '0x39b...'
export const asset = '0x6d8...'
export const rating = 'medium'
export const pool_risk = 'low'
export const asset_risk = 'low'
export const oracle_risk = 'low'
export const market_risk = 'medium'
export const collateral_risk = 'low'
Summary
Provide a brief overview of the market covered, key findings, and links to key resources (asset homepage, stats, documentation, etc.).
Pool Risk
Provide all relevant information that is used to assess the lending pool risk. In particular, discuss the following items:
- Smart contract risk
- Counterparty risk
Derive the appropriate pool risk rating using the following guidelines:
- ⬜ Neutral: Uses a factory extension and has no counterparty risk (achieved by pool immutability)
- 🟩 Low: Uses a factory extension or comparable (in terms of fail-safes, audits, and transparency), low counterparty risk (achieved e.g. through a decentralized governance process)
- 🟨 Medium: Uses an audited "experimental" extension with both source code and audit report publicly available, medium counterparty risk (e.g. due to a centralized governance process)
- 🟥 High: Else
Asset Risk
Provide all relevant information that is used to assess the asset risk. In particular, discuss the following items:
- Smart contract risk
- Counterparty risk
- Depeg risk
Derive the appropriate asset risk rating using the following guidelines:
- ⬜ Neutral: Native asset or comparable (e.g. WETH is comparable to ETH for the purpose of this report)
- 🟩 Low: "Blue-chip" asset or comparable (in terms of smart contract, counterparty and depeg risk)
- 🟨 Medium: Other assets with an audited, standard token implementation (e.g. ERC-20, ERC-4626) and both source code and audit report publicly available. Medium counterparty risk
- 🟥 High: Else
Oracle Risk
Provide all relevant information that is used to assess the oracle risk. In particular, discuss the following items:
- Smart contract risk
- Price composition
- Price timeliness
- Oracle fail-safes
Derive the appropriate oracle risk rating using the following guidelines:
- ⬜ Neutral: No oracle used
- 🟩 Low: Median (or another robust aggregation technique) of at least two price sources including one off-chain source. Fail-safes for staleness and other failure sources (if any) in place. Audited implementation.
- 🟨 Medium: TWAP (or another robust aggregation technique) of a single price source or insufficient fail-safes. Audited implementation.